The leaflet of the Democratic Party, released in our market a few days ago and the now famous article published on the inherent "Made Daily" which alludes to the fact that our Mayor, he released "easy" to achieve the consent of the famous nightclub that never opened, however, while its one of the owners of the property in question, bought the house in which, together with their family home, asked the League to know your thoughts on the merits of the case. Since I will not escape the topic, I'll try, briefly to give the Democratic Party and its leaders, a clear picture of what we think about the whole affair:
1) We start from the political manipulation that the Democratic Party, said he had ridden: it is curious that claims to the above, since going to market to the flyers in the newspaper article, alongside the symbols proprio del Pd, del Sel, dell’Idv e di Sinistra Critica certo non è una mossa che depone a favore della tesi sostenuta. Se non si fosse voluto che si pensasse a sciacallaggio politico, quanto meno si sarebbe dovuto avere il buongusto di volantinare non solo l’articolo apparso sul quotidiano il questione ma anche la risposta che il Sindaco ha ritenuto di inviare al medesimo giornale (che giustamente ha concesso il diritto di replica), così da dare ai nostri cittadini una piena informazione, rispetto alla vicenda. Se questa non è becera strumentalizzazione di parte come si può definire diversamente? Forse per lor signori, questa è giusta informazione.
2) It 's interesting to note that the Democratic Party in recent times is no longer looking for a comparison on the issues that can be expensive but the city has undertaken the traditional policy that seeks to insinuate doubt our citizens or as Shakespeare did say the officer Marcello , in Hamlet, or, "there is something rotten in Denmark." And so we move on Mafia infiltration of the houses sold for favors and so on and so forth. Let's try for once to follow them on their land and try to lodge a terrible doubt: and then, like a journalist, this Barbacetto, which certainly does not know where Magenta, to publish with such zeal, such news, rich particular, but also clearly instrumental and non-objective? As it happens, the journalist involved, as far as I know, (if someone can disprove it please do it in words on this blog), at an event organized by an association in our city and see if, after this coming in that of Magenta, the article appears miraculously. That some character during that seratina a bit 'left, has passed to the journalist who dotes certainly not the center, the clumsy tissue, thus initiating the policy of low coasters.
3) You can not help but wonder because, with all these elements are in place that already seem to want to write a sentence to our Mayor, the armed hand delivered the information in the hands of a journalist, failed to do so, according to the Law, the Public Prosecutor's Office through a complaint, so as to take all but say its all responsibilities of the case, before God and men. Why? If I were sure of what I argue in my thesis, I have no problem to introduce, without delay, to the Police to make a spontaneous deposition on the facts of which I am aware. Certainly it is much easier to pull the stone and hide your hand!
4) Ma poi, quali sono i “favori” che il Sindaco avrebbe fatto ai proprietari della discoteca? Ad oggi, la discoteca non è aperta e rispetto ai titolari, l’articolo, in modo certo poco fine e sul filo della querela fa trasparire come chi dovrebbe gestire l’ipotetica discoteca, potrebbe essere colluso con organizzazioni malavitose: anche qui se c’è chi sa qualcosa, corra, non vada, alla Procura o in una delle stazioni dei Carabinieri e sporga denuncia. Insomma tanti elementi e altrettanta omertà che certo non fa degli accusatori dei cuor di leoni! Diversamente, credo di essere la persona che dimostra che tali teoremi sono del tutto unfounded. Why? I show it to you now: a fact that the opening of the premises is not in the hands of this administration, but the Provincial Supervisory Committee, a body governed by the Prefect of Milan in this case, it is true that our mayor would have done all these favors , one wonders immediately place, because I write up has left two dissenting opinions, just the opening of the discotheque. If the Mayor did not want trouble on this story, of course, would do anything because the local police area, were not made and then made public, the views mentioned above. But I can say in no uncertain terms that this matter, as on everything In recent years we have had to face that we have always said that with the utmost transparency, all have the same rights and then, when it is correct to say so, it is said, where it is safe to say no, we say no.
In essence, the Democratic Party should try to have a shred of vision of our city that does not, then, in the absence of issues for debate, seeks to shift attention to the journalistic uproar. A divided Democratic Party (the show two different articles that speak before a united Democratic Party and then in a second, it is argued that the majority had worked as a first response to the re-consolidation of the minority (the Democratic Party has 5 counselors Minority 6, then one of two things, what is the real version?), Pd in \u200b\u200ba panic about losing an election in a year and a half, a Democratic Party that proposes to create pieces of our most civic lists in which bring together all, in short, a Democratic Party that is a mirror of what is happening around the center-left, now seeks to trigger dangerous reactions in our city that have as their basis of newspapers known to be deployed on the left (the fact and the espresso Daily) and sources from which it draws, that part of politics. In conclusion, what do you think? This murky and vulgar that we are not playing us. We think that the policy also includes strong verbal confrontation, but we do not believe violent is right to enter into discussions that animate our city, personal events that have nothing to do with the interests of the whole city. Today we ask the Mayor to make everyone aware about their salaries, how much he paid his own house, how many years he has signed the mortgage. If this is not political profiteering, there is another term for this policy: subversion, or attempting, through slander and lies, through the politics of suspicion and "is", without ever taking a bit of responsibility, to overturn an administration that instead, in an absolutely democratic, beat, twice the center-left, and he proposing that the city programs, then realized, since we were elected in 2002 with 54% of the vote, while in 2007 the percentage increased to 67%, thus relegating the center-left opposition, in our city for 10 long years . And that Ernesto Che Guevara used to say that "A real man must feel on his cheek, the slap-up to any man." I wonder if the bride and captive-communists, the enterprise will be able to know in the depths of their actions These words have drunk a lot and for many generations. I wonder if some child prodigy Magenta policy will never understand that you do not do politics in this way. Would be in this juncture too easy to ask members of the PD Magenta demand the resignation of their leader in the Senate, Senator Finocchiaro, whose husband in Sicily seems to have landed a appaltino in the field of healthcare, from 350,000 euros, without going through a public tender . However, if we dwell on these things only ever, would not solve the problems rather than ask us to solve our citizens who pay us for this and vote. I hope that the Democratic Party and its leaders to reason that the policy is to offer to our citizens in a year and a half, because Machiavelli, considered by many as the founder of Political Science used to say that 'E' common defect of Men, do not account, in the calm of the storm. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment